This story is part of a series of stories examining the total cost of risk, and the four areas motor carriers should consider when developing a risk management strategy. The first part of this series focused on risk transfer and the role insurance plays in risk management. Part two of the series addressed risk control, particularly the costs motor carriers face in preventing and mitigating losses. This article explores the administrative costs associated with risk management.
Safety efforts aim to protect employees from injuries, reduce the likelihood of accidents, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. However, while these benefits are clear, it is important to acknowledge the administrative costs associated with implementing and maintaining them. Below are a few administrative costs to consider, keeping in mind that investing in safety and regulatory compliance are expenses that can help reduce losses and boost revenue potential if properly managed.
One of the primary administrative costs of a safety program is related to personnel. These costs include the salaries of safety officers, managers, and other staff responsible for overseeing the program. These individuals are tasked with developing safety policies, conducting training, performing risk assessments, and ensuring compliance with safety regulations. Acquiring expertise in the area requires specialized, external training and certifications; those who have the credentials or competencies may require higher salaries. Additionally, the more complex the organization, the more personnel might be needed to manage safety effectively.
In addition, employee safety training can incur direct costs, such as a trainer’s salary and course materials, and indirect costs, including lost productivity when employees are in training.
Documentation is a critical component of risk management. Motor carriers should retain detailed records of all safety efforts, including incident investigations, facility inspections, and training. This administrative burden often requires dedicated staff or additional responsibilities for existing employees, and it can be time consuming and costly. Ensuring all documentation is accurate, up to date, and readily accessible adds to the administrative costs.
Motor carriers often invest in technologies to help effectively manage risk. These systems can include fleet management software, inward- and outward-facing cameras, and driver screening services such as the FMCSA’s Pre-Employment Screening Program. While this technology can help streamline processes, facilitate communication, and assist with documentation and reporting, it comes with upfront costs and ongoing maintenance expenses.`
Acquiring new technology often requires a significant initial investment. These expenses may include purchasing software, customizing it to the organization’s needs, and training employees how to use it. After the initial implementation, additional costs may be associated with maintaining the software, including updates, technical support, and potential upgrades as the organization’s needs evolve. In some cases, motor carriers might need to invest in new hardware, such as tablets or mobile devices, to allow employees to access safety systems. These costs can add up, particularly in large organizations with multiple sites.
As mentioned earlier, several indirect administrative costs are often associated with a motor carrier’s safety efforts. Here are a few costs to consider:
In conclusion, the direct and indirect administrative costs of managing risk can be significant for a motor carrier. However, these costs are often necessary to help protect employees, comply with regulations, and avoid more significant financial liabilities in the future. By effectively understanding and managing these costs, motor carriers can balance safety and economic efficiency, which can help to create a safer and more productive work environment.
Consider investing in inward- and outward-facing cameras for each truck.
Note: These lists are not intended to be all-inclusive.
This material is intended to be a broad overview of the subject matter and is provided for informational purposes only. Joe Morten & Son, Inc. does not provide legal advice to its insureds or other parties, nor does it advise insureds or other parties on employment-related issues, therefore the subject matter is not intended to serve as legal or employment advice for any issue(s) that may arise in the operations of its insureds or other parties. Legal advice should always be sought from legal counsel. Joe Morten & Son, Inc. shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss, action, or inaction alleged to be caused directly or indirectly as a result of the information contained herein. Reprinted with permission from Great West Casualty Company.